Client Side System Consultants vs Implementation Consulants

Publisher: Principal HCM Group

Access this content

Your content has been opened.

Please verify you are a human before downloading this content.

Client Side System Consultants vs Implementation Consulants has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?

Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.

Can't get to your email right now?

To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.

Please enter a valid verification code.

Code sent to:

Also, remember to check in your spam, promotions, and other folders.


Register to access this content


By accessing content on the SHRM Human Resource Vendor Directory you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.

Client Side System Consultants vs Implementation Consulants

At Principal Group, we argue there's a critical gap in enterprise system implementations that needs addressing. While implementation consultants excel at technical delivery, we see an increasing demand for client-side HR system consultants who can truly drive business value. Here's why: Implementation consultants focus on getting the system configured correctly, but who ensures it actually transforms your business? Who manages stakeholder alignment? Who designs the processes that will make your investment worthwhile? This is where client-side HR system consultants become invaluable, and it's exactly what we focus on at Principal Group. Our experience shows that there's a need for more client-side HR system consultants who can bridge the gap between technical possibilities and business realities. That's the difference between implementing a system and delivering lasting value.