Reinventing the Digital Labor Market: How Job Boards Without Trust Mechanisms Fuel Inefficiency

Publisher: The Job Applicant Perspective

Access this content

Your content has been opened.

Please verify you are a human before downloading this content.

Reinventing the Digital Labor Market: How Job Boards Without Trust Mechanisms Fuel Inefficiency has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?

Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.

Can't get to your email right now?

To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.

Please enter a valid verification code.

Code sent to:

Also, remember to check in your spam, promotions, and other folders.


Register to access this content


By accessing content on the SHRM Human Resource Vendor Directory you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.

Reinventing the Digital Labor Market: How Job Boards Without Trust Mechanisms Fuel Inefficiency

Online hiring platforms have become central to the U.S. labor market infrastructure, yet they lack the most fundamental feature present in nearly every other digital marketplace: user-side trust mechanisms. While economists and public policy experts have long focused on issues like wage stagnation, labor force participation, and skill mismatches, they have largely ignored how the structure of job boards actively exacerbates inefficiency. This paper argues that the absence of feedback systems for job seekers is not merely a design flaw but a structural market failure. When platforms prioritize employer engagement without requiring reciprocal accountability to job seekers, they create perverse incentives that result in ghost jobs, scam postings, resume spam, and costly talent shortages. A functional labor market requires trust on both sides. Without it, inefficiency is not incidental—it is engineered.