Standalone I-9 vs. Integrated: Why Tying Compliance to Other Systems Can Backfire

Publisher: Clear I-9

Access this content

Your content has been opened.

Please verify you are a human before downloading this content.

Standalone I-9 vs. Integrated: Why Tying Compliance to Other Systems Can Backfire has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?

Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.

Can't get to your email right now?

To complete your registration and access this content, enter the sign-in code sent to your email.

Please enter a valid verification code.

Code sent to:

Also, remember to check in your spam, promotions, and other folders.


Register to access this content


By accessing content on the SHRM Human Resource Vendor Directory you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.

Standalone I-9 vs. Integrated: Why Tying Compliance to Other Systems Can Backfire

HR teams often integrate I-9 compliance into payroll or ATS for convenience—until vendor changes make it a costly headache. Hidden migration fees, compliance risks, and operational disruptions turn a simple switch into a major challenge. A standalone I-9 solution ensures seamless compliance, eliminating vendor lock-in and unexpected costs. Discover why businesses are moving away from integrated I-9s and how to protect your HR operations from compliance pitfalls.