Access this content
Your content has been opened.
Normative vs. Ipsative Assessment Models: Why It Really Matters! has been emailed to . Entered the wrong email?
Don't see the content in your inbox?
Make sure to check your spam and other messages folders.
Can't get to your email right now?
Please enter a valid verification code.
Code sent to:
Register to access this content
By accessing content on the SHRM Human Resource Vendor Directory you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy; and, you acknowledge that your information may be shared with the content publisher.
This white paper delves into the fundamental differences between Normative and Ipsative assessment models in talent selection. It provides a comprehensive overview of how Ipsative assessments focus on individual self-reflection and personal growth. In contrast, Normative assessments offer comparative insights by measuring candidates’ abilities against a broader group or standardized criteria. The white paper highlights the benefits of Normative assessments in recruitment, emphasizing their reliability, predictive validity, legal defensibility, and scalability. It encourages organizations to assess whether their current tools are Ipsative or Normative and why Normative assessments are the preferred choice for making data-driven, objective hiring decisions.